![]()
The Featured Artists Coalition campaigns for the protection of performers' and musicians' rights. We want all artists to have more control of their music and a much fairer share of the profits it generates in the digital age. We speak with one voice to help artists strike a new bargain with record companies, digital distributors and others, and are campaigning for specific changes.
Events
The Air Statement
25th September 2009Last night at a very special meeting took place at Air Studios in London. It was an unprecedented gathering of artists who all met in the spirit of collaboration and with the aim of discussing the very challenging issue of file-sharing and how it affects the lives of so many artists and all the people that support them in creating the music that we all know and love.
The statement below is the result of that meeting.
The Air Statement:
We the undersigned wish to express our support for Lily Allen in her campaign to alert music lovers to the threat that illegal downloading presents to our industry and to condemn the vitriol that has been directed at her in recent days.
Our meeting also voted overwhelmingly to support a three-strike sanction on those who persistently download illegal files, sanctions to consist of a warning letter, a stronger warning letter and a final sanction of the restriction of the infringer’s bandwidth to a level which would render file-sharing of media files impractical while leaving basic email and web access functional.
Signed:
Tim Rice-Oxley (Keane)
Jamie Turner
Adriano Buffone (Raygun)
Allan Bradbury
Helienne Lindvall
Tony Crean
Andrew Laidlaw (Luck Soul)
Isard Haasakker
Tony Morrelli (The Fire Escapes)
Jean-Baptiste Pilon (The Fire Escapes)
Mark Headley (The Fire Escapes)
Hal Ritson (The Young Punx)
Billy Bragg
Ben Ward
Karl Harrison
Howard Jones
Tjinder Singh (Cornershop)
Phil Simpson
Atheen
Steve Jones
John Reynolds
Sandie Shaw (via phone)
David Rowntree (Blur)
Ed O’Brien (Radiohead)
Alan Sharland (The Hoosiers)
Martin Skarendahl (The Hoosiers)
Steven Hogarth (Marillion)
Mark Kelly (Marillion)
Guy Chambers
Patrick Wolf
Sam Duckworth (Get Cape Wear Cape Fly)
Jamie Allen
Toby Sebastian
James Kelly
Beryl Marsden
George Jones
Ross Millard (The Futureheads)
Stax Dempsey
Rona Sentinar
Fran Healy (Travis)
Karl Addy
Nathan Taylor (The Young Punx)
Josh Allegro
Ali Howard (Lucky Soul)
David Arnold
Lucy Pullin (The Fire Escapes)
Annie Lennox (via phone)
Lily Allen (Not a Member of the FAC)
George Michael
Nick Mason (Pink Floyd)
Signed After the meeting;
The Music Producers Guild
John B
Claudia Brucken (Propaganda)
Rick Wilde
Zita McHugh
M B Gordy
Mohammed Yahya
Jon Hopkins
Barry Coffing
Vinny Peculiar
David Ravden
Nik Ledgard (Dry Riser)
Matthew Lintott (Dry Riser)
Pete Bembridge (Dry Riser)
Jack Oram (Dry Riser)
Chad Mcloughlin
Gina Langton
Tony Christie
Sean Fitzgerald
Irving David (DWFM Beckman)
Julianne Reagan (All About Eve)
Stuart Ongley (SGO Publishing)
Judy Dyble
Jonas Kroon
Irwin Sparkes (The Hoosiers)
Robbie Williams
Robert Vale
Jerry Vale
David Cloyd
Rob Boyd (The Hillfields)
Sharon Corr
George Sarah
Bob Hansmann
Rich Wilde
Milinda Allen
Dr Robert (The Blow Monkeys)
Dirk Henry (The Kokoon)
Ben Beer (Sealife)
Chris White (Composer)
Producers Managers Group (PMG)
Marco Pirroni
Brian Campbell (Clinic)
Morty Buffham (Manager of UK Heights)
Andrew Kremer (Composer)
Sharon Dean (Respect Music)
Sarah McQuaid
Gary Clark (Artist, songwriter, producer)|
Marc Marot (Manager)
Keith A. Newstead
Blake Morgan (Engine company Records)
Tom Green ('Another Fine Day')
Neil Preston (MP Records)
John Verity
Bart Schram (Mindgames)
Koen Gisen (An Pierlé & White Velvet)
Darren Hayes (Savage Garden)
Scott Coe (The Haunted Aquarium)
Miranda Dickinson
Noora Noor
Ali Hakimi (Bush Studios)
Colin MacIntyre (Mull Historical Society)
Rik Hudson (Violet Bones)
David Blake (JFXmusic)
Jo Hilditch (Hilda)
Alastair Blackwood (Motion Picture Soundtrack)
Dobs Vye (Public Symphony)
James Blunt
Mark Muggeridge (Journalist and artist manager)
Russell Lewis Warby (William Morris Endeavor Entertainment)
David Gilmour
Jools Holland
Ken Andrew (Middle of the Road)
Joseph Mount (Metronomy)
Luke Soloman (Freaks)
Tom Shore (Britten Sinfonia)
Neil Tennant (Pet Shop Boys)
Chris Lowe (Pet Shop Boys)
Kirsty Hawkshaw
Glenn Tipton (Judas Priest)
Rob Halford (Judas Priest)
Jayne Andrews (manager for Judas Priest)
Gill Vance (singer/songwriter)
Simon Reid & Louise Stanners (Reid & Stanners)
James Carrington
Tim McConway (Booger Red/The Lunar Society)
James Mathe (Monasteryo)John (JJ) Johnson
Add a new comment
Back to blogs page

digg
del.icio.us
vox
facebook


Comments
I support Lily in her attempt to stand up for what she believes and I understand how she feels having been through a similar battle last year. However, I'm not sure whether I would feel comfortable signing this petition in favour of the three strikes and squeeze bandwidth approach. Although I can understand the reasons why the FAC has taken this stance. In the short term, three strikes may sway some people from unauthorised file sharing, it seems like it's putting a plaster on this giant gap between a culture that the industry has allowed to breed for the past 10 years since napster and the fundamental operations of an old industry business format. Bridging that gap will potentially be even more difficult than it is now if the three strikes plan is implemented, but, cannot truly be enforced or if it's found to violate civil liberties.
Kind Regards,
Indiana Gregg
Kerchoonz Ltd.
Self-confessed music addict. I pump more money into the music industry through physical media (I still love vinyl and CDs) and concerts/gigs than I have ever taken from it. I still like mp3 for convenience when travelling and at work, and, I usually like to be able to choose what quality I rip this media at e.g. bitrates, filetype, etc.
However, if I buy an album on CD, but want the convenience to be able to download it for free elsewhere via P2P does this make me a criminal or should I have my bandwidth "squeezed"? I think not. If an album that I intend to buy anyway appears on a P2P site before it's official release and I download it should I have my bandwidth "squeezed"? Again, I think not.
What about the concept of "filler" tracks? Another thing that caught the music industry off-guard. How long did we tolerate buying albums to discover that only 2 tracks on the album were any good and subsequently felt cheated? Good marketing, eh? Thankfully, this is no longer the case.
Did bands that made an impact via P2P and social networks, such as the Arctic Monkeys, sign up to this? I seem to recall they broke on P2P networks and have not done too badly. Other useful things P2P has given us - music by artists like Soulwax/2ManyDJs and Dangermouse that would never have seen the light due to record companies, artists and copyright, stifling creativity.
I seem to remember the chap from Radiohead, another band I own many CDs by, commenting that his friend had been a pirate for years (?), correct me if I am wrong, and that he said something along the lines of "forget about it". That's pretty much where we are - if you go after the people and the protocols then people involved in these technologies, and remember the industry was caught on the back foot, will develop another new technology that will make it harder again to be traced.
Think about what you are doing because, as you suggest, you will put people off buying your music, which happened with Metallica after the Napster case. Disappointed, but will still buy the physical product.
My 2p.
Thanks, FAC, you've just generated a list of artists who I will no longer support. I'll spend my cash with artists with more vision. I'm especially disappointed by Billy Bragg.
A question for Dave Rowntree of Blur. How do you square your position here with that held as a supporter of ORG, an organisation that campaigns against disconnections?
This is an artistic movement masterminded by Lily Allen, the world famous intellectual. No wonder it's so out of touch. In 25 years, how funny this will look.
I was at Radiohead show last month, it was in PoznaĆ. Thank you Mr. O'Brien, if you read this, (and the same thank you's for the rest of the Band of course) for one of the best live music experiences I've ever had :)
The ticket was quite expensive for me, as I'm still a student with no work... But I know, and had known it before the gig, that I'd spend my last money on music, supporting all of the musicians I respect and whose music I love.
I'm not British, so this whole bandwidth resticting won't affect me... yet, let's see how it's gonna be like in Poland in a few years. But I'm really sad about the FAC statement... Of course, I'm not a musician, I guess I maybe shouldn't express my opinion here, cause I have really no idea about artists problems of making a living from their work...
All I want to say is I love music and I support artists as much as I can... But I can't afford, and in my opinion, no one who's a huge music fan could afford paying for ALL the music he/she loves. My music taste, all of the CDs and vinyls I bought, all of the shows I've been to are the effect of file-sharing. My favorite artists were discovered by me thanks to other music enthusiasts and P2P users. I've financially supported all of my favorite performers in some way, maybe not us much as they deserve, but as much as I simply could. And I'm gonna still do it in the future.
Of course, I can see how file-sharing can be dangerous for many artists, but there's also the other side of this issue. This is really the best and the cheapest way for the musicians to get heard. Maybe they lose huge amounts of money but they also get many new listeners willing to pay for their work. It's impossible to tell if file-sharing is bigger threat than a chance for artists and without any good research we just can't judge it. So I guess all we can do now is to accept pluses and minuses of file-sharing.
Again, I'm not a musician and I can't even imagine how the survival in this branch looks like. But it's without a doubt that all of the FAC members are huge music fans, just like I am, and other people speaking their minds here are. Please, just try to imagine how we feel about the whole issue. We feel restricted. I want to broaden my horizons, find new exciting things, experience the real culture, not the 'so called music' which is 90% of what we can hear on the radio. I keep on repeating myself here, but I pay for all I can, the rest of it I can't simply afford NOW but I'll do my best to do it in the future. If it makes me a thief, then OK, call me a thief, I won't protest.
I strongly believe there are other solutions of this problem - file-sharing won't never end as the technology gives filesharers new possibilities all the time. CD prices? New business models? There are many other solutions to talk over...
I call upon all of the music fans not to be childish talking about boycotts of FAC members... If we want to have right to broaden our music horizons, then let the artists have right to make a living of what they love. If you liked Lily Allen's music and now you say you won't ever listen to her, you hurt yourself much more than Lily.
Mr. O'Brien, as you are the only artist from FAC whose music I ever downloaded and I really enjoy, I'd like to assure you I'd do anything to support your work. And I'm sure there many, many more people who think the same. Just give me some time, cause it seems my appetite for amazing art grows faster than money in my wallet :) The last thing: in 2007 in some magazine there was an interview with Radiohead, based on fan questions. My question was asked, and it was also about file sharing. Your band mate, Colin Greenwood, said in this interview something I'll never forget, something about critcising file-sharing: "You're forgetting what music is all about: excitement and talent and artists doing cool new things that people are into. That's what record companies had forgotten about. they were worrying about all these ancillary questions and forgetting about the primal urge of people to share and enjoy music. And there's always going to be a way of finding money or livings to be made out of it."
I'm still a supporter of FAC and I wish all of the artists and all of the music fans to find a solution which is the best for everyone. Hope it'll be gained in a spirit of mutual respect and without offending any artists by their listeners and vice versa.
Ola, Poland
i wrote before but i just wanted to mention, that from all this post, i truly think Ola B has the most important words [ thanks Poland ! ! ] and i also think , she is expressing like it should be express something i tried to explain before, with my bad english and mess ideas
Ola B - i am proud of you - and if this world starts again one day , i vote U as one of the persons to express the new world's ideas which I think , will go further further further than file sharing -
if you don t believe me, please believe in thom, who said the most beautiful words lately about [ limitless economic growth ] - first person in the world that i hear talking about it , he KNOWS about life.
peace again for the world
An unenforceable law is a non-existent one. Are they going to start flipping through my ipod and looking in my pockets to see if I have a usb harddrive on me? Even if they would only target internet-based file-sharing (ie: when one computer talks directly to the other via the ISP), it's going to be impossible to track people down if they have even a passing understanding of computer-security concepts.
The reason artists do not understand that it's a lost battle is because artists apparently don't work with, or understand the technologies they are trying to rule by law.
It's just not going to work. Example: It's impossible to get cocaine at all, right?
Hi, I barely speak english, and have no time and desire to transalate it correctly so beg your pardon about:
I´m a musician and understand the position of artist, make just one song is a huge and hard work, it requires a great idea, a lot of arragements, quality instruments and microphones, lot of hours of recording and rehearsals, then you do it and hours later your track is all over the web for free.. it´s not nice. But truly internet could be and should be the inmense and free book of knowledge. It´s just the culture what can unite the world in a self social class. Do you imagine the possibility to know everything just one click away?
It´s true that we have to find the way people compromise, and make their contribution in all ways to this giant, and on that way is necesary do something to educate people; but be careful with what you do, because every great idea could be used for make good or evil. read between the lines, check the fine print. Don´t allow the obscure corporations be the owners of our found new chanels of distribution.
With all my love.
Fran.
A huge fan of Radiohead [Hi Ed! Thanks for Radiohead, had been an amazing 13 years hearing you].
Just expression of my ideal: I think this business is moving on [should moving on] to the craft, to the physical, to the collectors series. Charge to the wealthy and leave the poor ones reach the incredible sounds of "the gloaming" for example. And please remember we should give the ten percent of our earnings to them.
I think it might be necessary to analyze the statement a bit.
"We the undersigned wish to express our support for Lily Allen in her campaign to alert music lovers to the threat that illegal downloading presents to our industry and to condemn the vitriol that has been directed at her in recent days. " [emphasis added]
As shown, this expressed the views of the undersigned. This is something that I could have imagined the signees choosing to accept, given a bit of a push (and a few drinks).
"Our meeting also voted overwhelmingly to support a three-strike sanction on those who persistently download illegal files, sanctions to consist of a warning letter, a stronger warning letter and a final sanction of the restriction of the infringer’s bandwidth to a level which would render file-sharing of media files impractical while leaving basic email and web access functional." [emphasis added]
Strictly speaking, this is a statement of fact (what occurred at the meeting) rather than an opinion. A signature here does not necessarily mean that the signee wants a three-strike program. Of course, the likely confusion would have easily been enough to prevent me from signing such a document -- but, perhaps some of the signees were duped into having their names attached to this paragraph given the assurance that their signatures do not signify support for these measures.